Issue 2, 2017

The Nordic asset management landscape is experiencing notable shifts in investment strategies, regulatory scrutiny, and investor transparency. Danish pension funds DIP and JØP are implementing risk factor approaches under new leadership to enhance portfolio structure and risk diversification. In Sweden, pension system scandals involving asset managers Allra and Falcon Funds have intensified calls for reform, particularly on fund transparency and investor protection. Similarly, Nordic pension funds like Finland's Ilmarinen and Denmark's PFA are increasing allocations to alternatives such as private credit, infrastructure, and hedge funds, while grappling with issues like fee pressures and capacity constraints. The challenges inherent in regulating pension funds’ investments and disclosures are prominent in Norway and Sweden, reflecting the complexity of balancing risk controls, transparency, and maximizing returns.

Transparency remains a contentious but evolving area among Nordic pension funds. While Norwegian and Finnish pension funds generally publish detailed portfolio holdings to maintain open communication with stakeholders, Swedish and some Danish investors exhibit greater reticence due to concerns over competitive sensitivity, administrative burdens, and market impact. Nonetheless, leading funds recognize that transparency supports credibility in responsible investing and fosters stronger partnerships with asset managers. The trend towards integrating factor-based investing, alternatives, and impact strategies is also evident across the Nordics, with a growing emphasis on careful manager selection, capacity monitoring, and sustainable investment principles. As investors and regulators alike pursue more robust governance and tailored solutions, the Nordic asset management industry navigates complex dynamics between innovation, regulation, and fiduciary responsibility.

The magazine is only available to subscribers

If you’re new to Tell Media Group, create an account first.

Table of content

Introduction and Overview

This issue covers developments in Nordic pension funds, changing industry attitudes towards active management, factor investing, transparency in holdings, capacity constraints in asset management, and evolving strategies of major pension companies and asset managers.

Investment Strategy Review at DIP/JØP

New CIO Mikkel Svenstrup implements a risk factor approach, evaluates active vs. passive management, internal vs. external management, and seeks diversified portfolios to avoid concentrated risks.

Changes Underway for Sweden’s Premium Pension Platform

Following fund scandals, Swedish politicians consider reforms to improve transparency, fund selection requirements, and reduce fund numbers, with potential impacts on AP7-managed default option.

Icelandic Infrastructure Opportunities on the Rise

Liberalization of Icelandic capital controls opens new investment opportunities in infrastructure and energy, attracting Nordic investors’ interest for co-investments and growth prospects.

Nordea AM Foresees Tougher and More Competitive Climate

New CEO Nils Bolmstrand anticipates regulator-induced consolidation among distributors and asset managers, emphasizing need for size, product breadth, and international expansion.

Ilmarinen on Intensifying Hedge Fund Pressure

CIO Mikko Mursula highlights challenges in hedge fund fees and performance, anticipating industry shake-up with fee reductions and emphasis on niche, consistent performing managers.

Norway’s Pension Funds Fight New Regulation

Pensjonskasseforeningen opposes proposed tougher capital requirements that may halve equity allocations, arguing current framework suffices and warning of negative impacts on long-term returns.

Transparency of Pension Funds’ Holdings

Nordic pension funds show divergent practices in disclosing portfolio holdings; Norway and Iceland lead in transparency, while Sweden and Denmark show restraint citing administrative burden and strategy confidentiality.

SPK Takes External Manager Openness Further

Swedish pension fund SPK publishes reasons for external manager selections, enhancing transparency and fostering stronger relationships with asset managers and members.

Roundtable – Factor Investing Insights from Finnish Investors

Discussion centered on factor definitions, implementation, timing, portfolio construction, and ESG integration, highlighting both opportunities and challenges in adopting factor-based investing.

Capacity Constraints and Why Size Matters

Fund selectors emphasize the importance of matching fund size with strategy capacity, balancing allocations to avoid performance dilution or liquidity issues, and monitoring impact of rapid asset growth or shrinkage.

PFA on Cumbersome Alternatives Process

Group CFO Anders Damgaard discusses challenges in unlisted asset investments including due diligence, staffing, illiquidity risks, and efforts to expand direct investments amid regulatory scrutiny and market searches.

Finnish Church Pension Fund Looks Towards Impact Investing

Implementation of a new climate change strategy, increased allocations to green investments and alternatives, and growing interest in microfinance and impact investing characterize Kirkon eläkerahasto’s evolving approach.

Corporate Hospitality and Integrity

Nordic fund selectors stress professionalism and relevance in meetings with asset managers, maintaining integrity by limiting lavish hospitality and focusing on productive, business-related interactions.

The Reading List by Lasse Heje Pedersen

Recommended books blending academic insight with practical investment wisdom include biographies of Ed Thorp and Fischer Black, Richard Feynman’s adventures, and Antti Ilmanen’s guide to expected returns.

Up-Close and Personal: John Howchin, AP Funds’ Ethical Council

John Howchin shares his views on responsible investments, the importance of transparency, ongoing work on human rights, and balancing professional responsibilities with personal interests.